Saturday, August 05, 2006

Lebanon

It's hard to take sides in the situation in Lebanon right now. I can't find anyone who's position I like. The U.S. keeps talking about Hezbollah having to stop attacking Israel, but with everything I read, it sounds way more like Israel is doing most of the attacking. Hezbollah is mostly on the defense. Sure, Hezbollah triggered the whole thing by kidnapping the Israeli soldiers, but that's not what this war is about, Israel's main objective it disarming Hezbollah, the kidnapping only provided the excuse that Israel needed. This is clear because Israel isn't trying to get its soldiers back. Last week sometime Israel asked Bush not to send Condoleeza just yet because they needed another 10 to 14 days to do the damage they wanted to do to Hezbollah. If they were really interested in getting their soldiers back, they would have begun negotiating for them from day 1.

The Lebonese Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora, says that Hezbollah acted without the Lebonese government's support, but his proposed "solution" for this problem is a cease-fire, then a prisoner exchange, then negotiations. Hezbollah captured the soldiers in the first place in order to negotiate the release of Hezbollah prisoners in Israel, so Siniora's solution is basically the same as saying "just let Hezbollah win". If that's not supporting Hezbollah, I don't know what is.

The U.S.'s claim of wanting to negotiate a lasting solution before the fighting starts is just plain stupid. Negotiating a long term solution will take months, meanwhile people are dying and infrastructure is being destroyed that will result in thousands starving over the next year or so. Clearly the threat of resuming the war should be sufficient incentive to continue negotiating.

And what's with Bush's statement that Israel has the right to defend itself? How stupid does he think people are? Does he think people are going to hear that and not automatically think the Hezbollah and Lebanon also have a right to defend themselves? Doesn't everybody have a right to defend themselves? The whole reason we have laws and police in this country is to stop people from defending themselves, and then have their enemies defend themselves, in an endless cycle.

And another thing, Hezbollah kidnapped the soldiers in the first place in order to negotiate the release of Hezbollah prisoners in Israel. Doesn't that kind of imply that Israel captured Hezbolla soldiers first? Was Hezbollah merely defending itself when it kidnapped the soldiers in the first place?

1 Comments:

Blogger cavalry.joe said...

Hezbollah had been launching rockets into Israel before taking the prisoners. Israel did nothing. Then they kidnapped the Israeli soldiers and Israel saw an opportunity to disarm Hexbollah and keep them from launching any more rockets.

But there's more to it. When Israel bombed Qana Lebanon, which resulted in the death of 34 children, Israel said that it did not actively target civilians and that it was going to look into it. There was no rejoicing in Israel over the tragedy.

However, if Hezbollah kills Israeli women and children, they take to the streets and celebrate.

These people have stated that they do not recognize Israel and that they wish it was eradicated from the face of the earth (probably through irradiation).

In contrast, Israel recognizes the right of Lebanon to exist and they have not call for their eradication nor have they tried to irradiate Lebanon.

To say that the entire civilian population in Lebanon is innocent, is hard to swallow. These people openly express their love and support of Hezbollah. They are not interested in negotiating. They are only interested in the death of Israel.

The world has got to come to the realization that we are destined to go to war with radical islamists. The question now is, when and where.

7:12 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home